Re: Re: TR: Multiple subcult question

From: Peter Larsen <plarsen_at_...>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 23:34:23 -0800


Jeff Kyer says to

me:
>> Thunderous, you would be in the same boat 2 Aspects, 2 Subcults, 50%
>> worship. What happens, though, if you are a real weirdo and want to
>be
>
>The more common case is to be Aspect + Subcult + (other subcults)
>without another aspect. Just so you know... =)

        Really, I thought that cost the same 20% time as a second Aspect and Subcult, with a significant loss of magic. Now an additional Subcult in your Aspect makes more sense as it only costs 10%....

>> initiated to Hedkoranth and Helamakt Adventurous? I assume it would
>be 40%:
>> 10% Communal, 20% Aspect/Subcult, and 10% for the last Subcult. You
>would
>
>Nope. 10% communal, 20% aspect + first subcult + 20% for
>another subcult that DOES NOT MATCH THE ASPECT WORSHIPPED. Helamakt
>and Hedkoranth are both Thunderous Aspect Subcults.

        So the weirdos do lose on the time commitment, eh? It makes sense; there's a reason people do what they do, kid, don't buck the trend, your grandda knows what's right, etc, etc.... Is this in TR? I was looking for it, but the relevant section eludes me (I can't find anything on mismatched aspects, and I know it's there....)

>> >...it would look like my timesheet at work! (3.75 hours per week
>to
>> >Helemakt, 11.75 to Orlanth Adventurous.... And 3.75 to Torvald
>> >Meldekbane)
>>
>> Perhaps this is why double devotion is outlawed. The devotee's
>> worship roster would look like the billing sheets for a Celestial
>> bureaucrat, and Orlanth would smite the devotee out of habit....
>
>It would be divine double dipping devotion and we all know that being
>Generous is a kingly virtue, greedy-guts!

Bureaucratic bastard breaks all boundries, Odious to Orlanth, allseeing Allfather.
Cursed by clan, threatened by thunder,
slain by storm, judged by joyless
Havan Vor, he hastens to hell,
tied up in timesheets, lashed by lightning.

Peter Larsen

Powered by hypermail