RE: Re: FOUNDATION: Progress of the Siege

From: Jeff Richard <richj_at_...>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 12:44:51 -0800

That sounds like something I would do. Give a temporary feeling of accomplishment before disaster strikes ("what do you mean the Bat is dead?"). OK it sounds cool to me.

	-----Original Message-----
	From: dzo01 [mailto:dzo_at_...] 
	Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 12:41 PM
	To: whitewall_at_yahoogroups.com
	Subject: Re: FOUNDATION: Progress of the Siege
	
	
wrote:


	> You mean more than killing the Crimson Bat?

	
	I think he meant for the lunars?  We have to make this playable
for 
	both sides as it were...
	
	Yak


	> 

	>       -----Original Message-----

	>       From: jorganos [mailto:joe_at_t...] 

	>       Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 11:44 AM

	>       To: whitewall_at_yahoogroups.com

	>       Subject: Re: FOUNDATION: Progress of the

Siege


	>       

	>       

	>       --- In whitewall_at_yahoogroups.com, "Jeff Richard"

<richj_at_f...>


	> wrote:

	>       > If there was a breach in the wall in early 1619, I

doubt


	> Whitewall 

	>       > would last until late 1621.  Unless it was at a

completely 


	>       > inaccessible point.

	>       

	>       There might be a breach in _a_ wall. Or a temporary 

	functional


	> ramp up

	>       a distant part of the plateau. Something which allows

for 
	fierce


	> and

	>       desperate fighting, and a feeling of achievement.

	>       

	>       

	>       

	>       

	>       The New World Is Born On the Walls On Whitewall. Come

the


	> Hurricane!

	>       

	>       

	>       The New World Can Be Healed. Whitewall Must Fall!

	>       

	>       

	>       

	>       

	>       

	>   _____  

	>