Re: Three Runes

From: L C <lightcastle_at_UFGHAdHaSmOesuJaAIbh5WVvKorWnSPUf8sWJOO7NFbSXdfxrJg62O-jMNOdGA2a>
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 16:57:26 -0500

Richard Crawley wrote:
>
>
>
> Damned handy if you're, say, an Elz Ast Thief Taker though.
>

HAH!
> I'd be inclined to say yes, a
> sorcerer could too but I guess it comes down to "does the narrator
> think this is treating on the theist player characters' toes?"
>

I think this gets to the "does everyone have runes" or not thing. As it is, Theists can use all the common magic (to use the other term) of the other two systems.
It seems weird not to have it go both ways.

Again, this slides into an HQ2 rules question more than a Glorantha-wide question in some ways.

However, I do think that "people have runes they are associated with" is a Glorantha-wide question. Is it viewed that way by everyone? Is it only viewed as a source of magic by some if it is? Is actively rejecting your rune-nature and trenscending it considered to be important?

LC