Osentalka wrote:
>
>
> There are pros and cons for publishing subjective or objective books.
>
Indeed.
>
>
> Sartar IS an subjective book, period.
>
> Being what it is helps players to get into the culture, the setting, their
> magic, believes, etc.
>
> I like the subjective viewpoints of the gloranthan books.
>
So do I, but the fact that we aren't going to even get a hint at the
design philosophy underlying the three worlds means everyone who wants
to play anywhere else is going to have to make up their magic from
scratch with full expectation that it can (and likely will be) entirely
incompatible with what does come out.
LC