>This is the definition of a mage in canonical Glorantha, too. Where
your Glorantha may vary is in how common mages are vis a vis the regular
sort of wizard/sorcerer.
Ahh, I know that we were supposed to eventually get a definition of that. Very cool.
>We toyed with the idea of an "archmage" being someone who could create
their own grimoire, but my own feeling is that, once you've created a
bunch of spells, putting them down in a grimoire may not be >trivial,
but it's not another quantum leap in power, either.
*nod* It's the kind of thing a mage might do, but it isn't necessary.
Thanks.
That answered a long-standing question in the back of my brain.
LC
Powered by hypermail