>I am not convinced of the actual bonus to be derived from this. I do not
>think it makes up for their lack of CF. OTOH, I also think that the support
>rules are not the best way to simulate the battle for pasture that is the
>"real" motive for the tribal warfare. (IMO). Not that I know what is, but I
>soemhow feel that their is a less wargamey game somewhere in there where
>alliances and peace treaties are more important than soul-winds and Oakfed.
Yes. We are all waiting for your super-game, which better handles conflicts
over pasture and so on. There is more on all this waiting to be discovered.
After Convulsion maybe we'll have time to work on it.
Powered by hypermail