David Gadbois had written thus:
>> Note that I am not
>> in favor of a dumb mail exploder, since the digest format does impose
>> a sort of formal baseline that you just don't get from a constant
>> stream of messages.
>This may be true, to some small extent. But I'm skeptical as to what
>extent this effects Quality, particularly when the evidence is so
>non-existent, and the arguments why it even might are so slight.
hmm. A repeat of the Great Moose Debate with a reflecting mailing list would change your opinion, I'd bet.
'What's an elk??' 'It's a moose, isn't it?' 'Red Deer, ya dumb ass!' 'Tis not!' 'Tis so!'
End of Glorantha Digest V1 #194
Powered by hypermail