Whilst I reserve (and indeed often use, for example when determining whose round it is) the Plaintive option, in this case it was more a case of Faint Praise cum Hope: one expects that HW _will_ do a better job of this, which is not to entirely disparage what's been done to date, as for example Brian and Nick's various commendations, with which I can but Second to the House.
> leaders, demographics, herd size, secrets,
> history, annual activities, weird knowledge, preferred routes and grazings,
> spirit cults, ancestors, all that kind of stuff.
Agreed, that would be good. But even just taking what we already know about Praxian clans (sorry Brian) and putting into HW game terms would be a decent start.
Slan,
Alex.
Powered by hypermail