Calendar silliness

From: Peter Metcalfe <metcalph_at_bigfoot.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 19:41:02 +1300


Alex Ferguson:

>What you rashly believe to be the 'KraLor Dawn' is of course merely the
>wondrous event of the ascention of the Emperor Known Formerly as Yanoor,
>who -- [scribe chewed own leg off at this point]

I thought it was the Passing On of Vashanti that was so glorious, not the ascension of Yanoor. Godunya's own ascension, it must be said, cause nary a ripple in the outside world.

>I could just about believe that before the 'Dawn' this was true,
>but I'd rather believe that in Dara Happa at least, it was some
>Better number: like 300, or something. Something very Orderly
>and Solar.

Alas even the Orlanthi myths talk about the Emperor, his Ten Nobles and the 294 commoners. We could work out a (silly) scheme where the Buseri calculate that the number of Nobles is constant, but the number of commoners is dependant on the epoch. For example in the Golden Age there were ten thousand commoners, in the great darkness, only a hundred commoners survived and now etc. But the problem is the number of days per year has been fixed at 294 since the Sunstop whereas the Plentonic Calendar implies that an improvement must have taken place circa 1220 ST...

>The calendar
>operating between "the Dawn" (OST or 111,221 YS, takeyerpick) and
>the Sunstop I presume had 'leap weeks', with some years having 29 weeks
>and some 28, or some such device to that effect.

Surely 29 weeks and 30 weeks? Works out to one leap week every five years.

Powered by hypermail