Re: worlds

From: Weihe, David <Weihe_at_danet.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 18:29:12 -0400

> My only further comment on this is to note that your table has more
> gaps than actual table, which makes me wonder as to its utility
> as a taxonomic device. (Though I often wonder about Greg's, too.)
> In particular your choice of 'worlds' seems distinctly 'unorthogonal'...

The table works better if you reorder it as Animist, Theist, Sorcery, Mystic, Draconic, Dream. It then appears to cluster around a diagonal.

Also, Mystic/Theists would apply to the average East Islander. Depending on how you read the early Seshnelan records, the Sepedalists (sp?) may have been Animist/Sorcery. BlackArkat gives the trolls that spot, or else the Theist/Sorcery spot. This should pad out the matrix a bit.

---