> From: "Wulf Corbett" <wulfc_at_...>
>> has yet tried to abuse this; besides it is less "powergamey" than
>taking
>> followers).
>
>While this is true (and the problems of actually raising too many
>abilities limits the abuse still further), the system is geared
>toward numerous followers. Every thane (well, weaponthane) should
>have 4 warrior followers, for instance. That's a hell of a lot of AP.
Sure. I have no problem with the followers rules (in particular AP loaning)
as I think there are other balances in the system and during play. I just
meant that allowing extra keywords at 13 (even 15 as suggested) is not a
problem for the game.
Thom