"Innate magic: Your hero must give up all magic derived from the Otherworld: affinities, feats, charms, fetishes, spirits, scriptires, spells, amd grimoires, erasing them from his character sheet. He retains only his talents."
Of course, there is no example of concentrating innate magic. Since there is no Innate Magic religion (at least not in the book), there never would be a reason. The first example is concentrating common magic, which specifically says it doesn't concentrate innate. The impression isn't from the write up of self-rock teaching, it's that of the concentrations Innate is missing so your first thought is that this is that example. (Which it isn't.)
The confusion doesn't last through a good reading, but the first thought I had when reading was that this was going to be the example of concentrating Innate magic.
On 27 May 2004 at 11:02, Peter Metcalfe wrote:
> What particular part of the self-rock teaching gave you that impression?
>
> If you are victorious, your hero can concentrate all of his
> common magic, not just his innate magic. He can thus
> use talents and common magic feats, charms and spells
> as active abilities rather than just as augmentation.
> HQ p108.
>
> --Peter Metcalfe
Powered by hypermail