Re: Re: Mastery notation -- from the Continuum list, was: MG's Thoughts on Continuum 2004
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
In reply to
] [
Next in thread
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
]
Other mail archives
:
!!!!!!>
Visit the
Search Engine
of
Lhankor Mhy
<!!!!!!
From
: Guy Hoyle <
ghoyle1_at_...
>
Date
: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 05:49:50 -0500
I prefer the existing notation, with one change: where a character has 1 mastery )19w), make note of that (19w1). That's a bit more consistent IMO. Heck, why not make it 19w0 when they have NO masteries?
I guess that's 2 changes.
Guy
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
bethexton_at_...: "Re: How to do a "God-child""
Previous message
:
Tim Ellis: "Re: How to do a "God-child""
In reply to
:
Graham Spearing: "Re: Re: Mastery notation -- from the Continuum list, was: MG's Thoughts on Continuum 2004"
Next in thread
:
Alex Ferguson: "Re: Mastery notation -- from the Continuum list, was: MG's Thoughts on Continuum 2004"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
]
Other mail archives
:
!!!!!!>
Visit the
Search Engine
of
Lhankor Mhy
<!!!!!!
Powered by
hypermail