>Thanks, but I'd hate to run the character based on
>this.
Why not?
>> To encourage using evocative names for abilities. An
>> option would be to
>> simply count multiple words abilities as a single
>> word. Like for names and titles.
>Could do, though I think that's going too far.
I am mot sure. Otherwise people might be tempted to replace whatever evocative description by simple word abilities like "strong", "tall" or "clever"
>Yes, I see what you mean. Though the "presence
>oriented" aspect of "tall" is how we've tended to
>explain being able to increase such an ability.
On my side I prefer to keep such a thing as "Tall" as a physical aspect that usually cannot be improved. "Standing Tall" or "Towering above others" are another story altogether. Even "Massive physique" I see as improvable. Anyway, that is another debate.
>Or "over-optimistic", "over-confident"...
All good choices.
Powered by hypermail