On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:02 AM, Kenrae <kenrae_at_...> wrote:
>
>
> I think that, instead of comparing the two numbers and saying "this
> number is 25% greater so it should have 75% odds to win against the
> other", we should compare skill levels by comparing how difficult it
> is to achieve one from the other.
> The example was 10 and 15. How many sessions do you need to achieve a
> rank of 15 from 10? You can do it in the inmense number of two
> sessions. If you just increase the skill once per session, it's five
> sessions. Does it make sense that you can beat the pulp out of your
> former self from five sessions ago?
> IMHO, no.
>
> Greetings,
> -Sergi Díaz
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Powered by hypermail