> and the Sobjectivity Debate on Nick's www.etyries.com. Most of this
> has been covered before, and is certainly getting off topic here.
> If you want me to discuss this further, take it to e-mail.
I have read it, and that was why I chose the term relatavism: to indicate that a mythic fact can be both true and not true depending on who believed it/said it. This appears to be describing what you are above; what is the problem with the term relatavism? We appear to be speaking of the same thing after all.
Powered by hypermail