RE: Re: New Pelorian

From: Nick Brooke <Nick_at_...>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 09:18:36 +0100


Mark writes:

> Simply knowing and perhaps beginning to think NP might lead
> to a degree of *Lunarisation* ... this is not the same as
> *illumination*

However, *in-character* (as a Heortling barbarian), I would be *very* happy to blur this fine distinction.

If my son started learning New Pelorian (so he could chat up the pretty Lunar acolytes), I would warn him off, forbid him, and then disown him.

Besides, what makes you think you're less likely to convert with a Lunar girlfriend? (I call in evidence the Kingdom of Tarsh -- converted by Hon-eel; the former Kingdom of Sartar -- whose Prince, Temertain, is under the thumb of his Lunar fiancee Estal Donge; and doubtless many more local examples).

Speaking Lunar is *wrong*. Thinking Lunar is *wrong*. Going out with Lunars, fraternising with Lunars, seeing Lunars as human beings is *wrong*.

After all, if I'm wrong about all that, my knuckleheaded barbarian world-view all comes kinda unstuck, doesn't it? :-)

Cheers, Nick

Powered by hypermail