> I just meant that with the Humakti the swords are pretty much out all
> the time anyway. It's the best, if not only solution to problems.
A fine philisophy for them.
> And _if_ there is enough of a fundamental difference between the
> Heortlings and the Carmanians, well... let the Sword sort it out. No
> doubt Humakt will grant victory to those that are in the right, meaning
> us.
No doubt.
> But I'm starting to think that for the most part the Lunar (Carmanian)
> Humakti will be pretty much like their Heortling counterparts. Humakti
> have no problem with fighting on both sides of a war. Like Odin, Humakt
> always wins in war.
>
> I'll just make my, Dart Wader like, bad guy be an illuminated amoral
> Humakti noble. Since dicipline is so important to the Carmanians,
> there's propably no problem with his Humakti following a leader that is
> lax on the use of torture and undead for the greater war effort (as long
> as the Humakti themselves aren't the torturers).
He maintains honor by obeying his lord, no matter what the lord does. (Isn't that in the tradition of... Makla Mann (I can't remember the name right now)... who stayed by Arkat no matter what evil betrayal/transformation he did?
> Basically the point I'm trying to make with the character is that at the
> core Humakt is just about Death, and not much else. An evil amoral
> killer is (almost?) as good to Humakt as the most honourable warrior.
If the runes that are core to Humakt are Death and Truth, then as long as he is true to his vision of death, he's fine, right? *grin*
LC
Powered by hypermail