L C wrote:
>
> Trotsky wrote:
> >
> >
> > L C wrote:
> > >
> > > Doesn't surprise me in the least, actually. I think without a big
> > > screaming announcement about it it is almost inevitable.
> > >
> >
> > Even with a big screaming announcement I suspect it's quite likely. To
> > be honest, I'd do it announcement or no, because I *like* having the
> > list. Which probably makes me reactionary or something, but I couldn't
> > care less. I don't want a GM forcing me to play a game in a way I feel
> > uncomfortable with, and I sure as heck don't want to GM a game in way I
> > feel uncomfortable with. But I realise many don't feel the same, and
> > that's fine by me. YMMV, and all that.
> >
> Well, I feel the same about the "don't make me play in a way I feel
> uncomfortable with" part.
> We just differ on what we find comfortable. ^_^
>
Which is bound to be the case among any sufficiently large group of
gamers - especially where the system is as flexible as HQ. Which is cool :)
--
Trotsky
Gamer and Skeptic
------------------------------------------------------
Trotsky's RPG website: http://www.ttrotsky.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
Not a Dead Communist: http://jrevell.blogspot.com/