> I'm a reactionary, too (in a different way - I like Objective, rather than
> Subjective, ability ratings for my world, and I think Flaws are totally
> useless as a separate ability "type", as just two of my disagreements with
> the HQ2 rules. (On the other hand, I've got *other* disagreements with HQ1,
> HW, RQ1-2, RQ3, the old RQ4 beta, MRQ, Pendragon, Pendragon Pass, etc.
> etc.
> etc.)). Hang in there brother! Power to the People! No-one can make us play
> anything!
>
Can you detail these problems a bit perhaps? I am very curious about interpretations on the systems in the rulebook. (I am immensely frustrated with magic atm...)
Maybe in a more aptly named thread?
-- John Machin "Nothing is more beautiful than to know the All." - Athanasius Kircher, 'The Great Art of Knowledge'.
Powered by hypermail