Re: AW: Vedr. Re: In Defence Of A Goddess - A

From: Jakob Pape <chaomancer_at_pUAD6ECqDwFlj8FS93SitDBqDaR_cBB9Pj26bpFtd640iQSbPMYONabGTQqQHxdHG>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 12:47:50 +0100


On 5/10/07, Jeff Richard <richaje_at_afpRPW5mdA7D-jc2Cb3VW3G9E3jkf1phYmjGtRNJjrzO15DRUDseON_APoIvYFZXN4Gb2lAy1A.yahoo.invalid> wrote:
>
>
> The women who want to act out Orlanth's stories are odd. Then again,
> men who worship Humakt or Storm Bull are odd. Hell, why don't we
> whine about all the restrictions on Humakti or Storm Bull worshipers
> in Orlanthi society? We've given lots of taboos and restrictions to
> men and women who worship Death, lots of taboos and restrictions to
> men who worship the Raging Bull. We even have restrictions on men who
> worship Ernalda (even if they are simply things like they aren't part
> of the fyrd). So, what sort of taboos or other restrictions should
> exist around a woman who gets to participate in men's secret rites?
>
> Or is Vinga too important to you as a modern Western ideological
> statement to even play around with that question?
>
> Jeff

Is not being part of the fyrd more of a restriction for Nandanites than being part of the fyrd is for Vingans?

-- 
Jakob Pape

"Sometimes subtlety comes in the form of large explosions and jammed open
airlock doors."


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


           

Powered by hypermail