> Paul King:
> If you're making significant
> > changes to Gloranthan background then I think that
> we do need to see
> > some justification as to why it is a good thing.
> And this looks
> > like quite a fundamental change to a well-detailed
> goddess.
Yep. Agreed.
> Oh, it has happened before - Babeester Gor and Maran
> Gor were changed
> so that Maran was the fertile one and Babs was the
> infertile, virgin
> scary one. My Glorantha does vary on that one,
Yes, mine too. Or rather, it doesn't vary and hasn't varied. I saw no reason to re-label my existing PCs and NPCs. Having a greater variety of Gor types was a good, and I'm using them, but they've kept their original names.
Powered by hypermail