We do not want to know the name of the author, although there are not
many around. Let us not spill this on the on the MRQ (More Ranting than
Questions) forums, or else... I must admit that I had suspected some
decisions were non-intentional, and I am strongly against some rules WRT
runes, but it would not be the first time that an initial mistake
results in something positive in the end. Speculations about GLs and
runes have already lead to some interesting ideas.
> I had a private response to this post from a fellow Gloranthan author
> --- I wish to clarify, that the improved openness in the magic system
> that I percieve in MRQ compared to previous versions of RQ is at leat
> partially by mistake on their part, IMO, rather than by conscious
> design.
>
Powered by hypermail