Re: Re: Non-Exhaustive Augmenting

From: L.Castellucci <lightcastle_at_...>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:23:42 -0400


Yup. I find it becomes a legitimate augment from both keywords in this view.

LC

On August 28, 2007 12:19 pm, Ian Young wrote:
>
> By the way, this interpretation of keywords also handles the matter of
> duplicate abilities rather well. If keywords aren't broken out into
> lists of abilities, then there's no need to fret over the cumulative
> implications of specific abilities that appear in multiple lists.
>
> !i!

Powered by hypermail