Carl Fink:
>
> Yeah, but what I for one think of this is that it's *implausible*.
> It implies that there is no correct answer, that Glorantha has *no*
> underlying reality of any kind.
I agree that there is an underlying (or overlying, or transcendental or whatever) reality, but remember that all explanations, mythic or scientific, are just symbolic interpretations.
That said, I think it's worthwhile to discuss the "reality", because it's easier to deduce different cultures slant on things if we have an opinion on "reality" than it is if we have to reverse-engineer everything everytime. (I know Alex will disagree about this, it's a recurring theme...)
Powered by hypermail