I find Trotsky's interpretation most compelling, and that in no way invalidates the sacred geometry which Simon espouses. The differences between sacred and mundane geometry is the same as those between Euclidean and non-Euclidian geometry. Sacred geometry deals with perfect Forms, and must therefore be a higher knowledge. Mundane geometry deals with imperfect, broken reflections and must therefore be a base knowledge. Replace Euclidean with Zzaburite, and you have your Gloranthan connection.
--
Michael Schwartz
raconteurx_at_mindspring.com
--__--__--
End of Glorantha Digest