> I should think that a "played out" HQ in which one gains a new feat
> should gain you that feat without needing to improvise it (unless,
of
> course one needs to improvise the feet in the course of the
HQ...).
> A feat that you want to cement without having to improvise first in
> any other situation will cost you the "not used in play" price, and
> would assume a HQ performed "off stage". A feat improvised then
> cemented costs the "used in play" price, and again assumes an off
> stage HQ to fully understand the actions of your diety
>
> Hmm - should a feat become *harder* to improvise if you decide not
to
> cement it - a devotee with a couple of masteries might not care
about
> a -3 penalty to a feat compared to spending the HP to boost
> skills/affinities?
I get the feeling that feats should be a much bigger deal than they appear to be at first glance. Certainly if feats only eliminate a measly -3 improv modifier (-15% in RQ terms) they're small potatoes indeed. I think a 5 pt bonus is the lest I would expect, over an improvisation.
Simon Hibbs
Powered by hypermail