>
> > Yes. There's already a pretty good tradeoff: do I spend hero
points
> > on a temporary bump (even if it's an augmentation that lasts for a
> > contest), or do I spend them on permanent improvement? There never
> > seem to be enough to go around.
>
> With respect, anecdotal "there is no problem" assertions seem
> inappropriate in the context of a rules discussion list, in the
> context where someone has expressed (anecdotally or otherwise)
disquiet
> with the very "not a problem" rule in question.
>
> However traditional or popular.
I would suggest you look at the two camps. I note that the people who
are playing frequently or have running games seem to have fewer
problems while those who arm-chair the rules seem to agonize over
every nuance of the rules.
Perhaps I see _this_ as a problem.
Jeff