>> Maybe this was intentional, but the way the book
>phrases it suggests
>> that these should be kind of even. So I'd be
>inclined just to house
>> rule it and say that there are no multiple target
>penalties, but
>> maybe still allow community support, because big
>gatherings do seem
>> like they should be more potent that small ones.
In fact, my intent was exactly that there is a decreasing return on the larger and larger communities.
The Western Churches have a tendency to centralize, by their nature, but the returns diminish as they do so.
Sincerely,
Greg Stafford
Powered by hypermail