> > Mmm, I think there are a few Gloranthan atheists (and I think the
> > Brithini are among them) who deny the Invisible God. After all,
> > there's not really any proof he exists. It could all be the working
> > of deluded (or corrupt) sorcerers or the powerful Otherworld beings
> > known as saints.
>I understood, from other conversationms, was that the whole point about
>their viewpoint was that it could be proved?
It can. OTOH the viewpoint of believing Malkioni can also be proved. And no, this isn't a contradiction but simply due to the fact that both sides start off with different premises and end up with different proofs.
--Peter Metcalfe
Powered by hypermail