Re: Re: Deva?

From: Nick Eden <nick_at_...>
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2002 12:51:53 +0000


On Fri, 01 Feb 2002 16:12:44 +1300, you wrote:

>David Dunham:
>
>>IMO the Orlanthi refer to daimones as spirits.
>
>>Spirit is a perfectly good English word, so it's the best
>>translation.
>
>Using spirits for petty gods does lead to the confusing
>situation where if you want a magician to deal with a
>spirits, the spirit-talker may not be the best person to
>ask.

But can make for an entertaining scene if the player characters put all their faith into the Kolating, who can't even start to deal with the problem.

>Since spirit-talkers deal with a general type of otherworld
>creature, I find it difficult to struggle against the obvious
>deduction that the Orlanthi consider those otherworld entities
>to be spirits.
>
>>If the average Orlanthi even distinguishes -- Otherworld creatures
>>are the domain of god-talkers and spirit-talkers, and they're all
>>called spirits. Just as I call things animals and let the specialists
>>worry about whether they're ungulates or artiodactyls.
>
>I think the distinction between god-creatures and spirit-creatures
>is more obvious than that (between sea-creatures and flying-
>creatures would be a better analogy IMO).

Sometimes.

It's easy to tell the difference between an incarnate humakti daimone and a ghost, but I don't think most Heortlings could tell the difference between a wind spirit and a wind daimone.

They're even less likely to know what this strange thing the lunars have sent against them that doesn't feature in any of the clan's myths.



York BSAC Web Page:
http://website.lineone.net/~york_bsac

Powered by hypermail