> wrote:
> Jane's interpretation seems more valid to me.
Interesting.
> But legal matters like
> this are decided by the Courts, not us.
And shaped by lawyers, who drew up that material. We live in a land of laws, whoich is shaped by lawyers.
> Is this sort of scary wording
Perhaps regretably, necessary wording,
> stopping folks publishing fun Gloranthan stuff?
What a shame if a misunderstanding causes that.
I've had a lot of people write to me for clarification, and they were
reassurfed.
What a shame for all the people that did not.
> Also, checking sites for supposedly illegal content IS an attempt to
> police them.
Yea, but Jane was talking about the Gloranthan content being approved.
> Aside from that not being Issaries' job,
Policing my IP for illegal and potentially damaging use is Issaries' job, and entirely necessary. Approving Gloranthan is entirely different.
> you're being
> self-contradictory. Does this count as the fastest Gregging ever? ;-)
Come to one of my Q&A sessions some time and I am pretty sure you will see a faster one. :)
Issaries, Inc.
c/o Greg Stafford
1942 Channing Ave, #204
Berkeley, CA 94704 USA
Powered by hypermail