YGWV
valkoharja wrote:
*Argh!* :)
>
> But for what it's worth, I'm sure I'm not the only one who would like
> to see the stats _you_ would put down for them at this point of time.
> I'd like numbers that fit the rest of the published numbers at this
> point. Character advancement is a horrible can of worms anyway, and
> I'd rather fiddle with advancement that to keep fiddling with major
> characters.
As I said, I will be doing stats/descriptions for GAC, and this
discussion is really helpful to determine what needs to be said.
--GS
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]